Med den kvalitet 'venstreside' har højresiden i dag alt, alt for let spil. (Min kommentar på artiklens hjemmeside)
Ronny, du er vel godt klar over, at du selv (og alle andre), der accepterer den officielle version af 9/11 køber en 'konspirationsteori'? Det er så blot det dybt korrupte amerikanske establishment's version af en konspiration om Al Qaeda. Du tror altså på CIA, Cheney og Bush? - Jeg betragter CIA og folk som Cheney og Bush som de mindste troværdige mennesker i verden. Din tilgang synes ikke lige frem skarp.
Mht. falske flag og konspirationsteori generelt så ligger det i sagens natur, at man er nødt til at spekulere og undersøge ting, der er vanskelige at finde mange bekræftelser på - alene for at kunne sætte spørgsmålstegn ved de officielle versioner. Men at sætte generelt spørgsmålstegn ved selve ideen om 'konspirationsteorier' og 'falske flag' er uendeligt anti-intellektuelt og dybt konservativt.
Når det gælder om at implementere 'falske flag', så er CIA verdensmestre i 'falske flag' operationer. Hvor de siden anden verdenskrig konstant har støttet 'oppositioner' i alverdens lande og på den måde fået styrtet 'regimer', som ikke ville tjene USAs korporative interesser (der er en god del seriøs) litteratur omkring dette. Men den kender du vel, når du fører dig frem som velorienteret). Ja, CIA er et instrument for amerikanske korporative magtforhold. Det sagde Bernie Sanders allerede for fyrre år siden og han har stået ved det i den nærværende valgkamp. Og du trækker Cass Sunsteins bog frem som argument. Suk...
Jeg skal ikke bruge hele dagen på dette her. Så jeg vil nøjes med et par link nedenfor, jeg lige har googlet frem efter hukommelsen på et par minutter. Her først et link til min egen artikel om USAs korrupte politiske system, USAs korporative imperialisme og vores mediers propaganda for USAs krig i Syrien lige nu: http://www.kommunikationsforum.dk/artikler/USAs-politiske-system-er-korr...
Martin Luther Kings familie vandt i 1999 en retssag mod den amerikanske regering for en eller anden form for medvirken i MLK's drab: "Dr. Martin Luther King’s family and personal friend/attorney, William F. Pepper, won a civil trial that found US government agencies guilty of assassination/wrongful death. The 1999 trial, King Family versus Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, is the only trial ever conducted on the assassination of Dr. King. The King Center fully documents the case, with full trial transcript (to more fully explain the following summary of evidence, here is the best article I’ve found)."
Selvom Kings familie bad om, at medierne skulle sprede denne historie, så er det vist aldrig sket (fortæl mig endelig, hvis jeg tager fejl!): "Coretta Scott King: “We have done what we can to reveal the truth, and we now urge you as members of the media, and we call upon elected officials, and other persons of influence to do what they can to share the revelation of this case to the widest possible audience.” – King Family Press Conference, Dec. 9, 1999." http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/01/martin-luther-king-assassinated-u...
I 2013 fik en engelsk statsborger rettens ord for, at BBC havde lavet falske repræsentationer af 9/11. Her et citat fra artiklen:
"Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.
So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee." https://www.sott.net/article/266268-UK-man-wins-court-case-against-BBC-f...
Der er meget, der tyder på, at John F. Kennedy også blev myrdet af højtstående amerikanske folk - sammen med CIA og/eller FBI. Læs nogle af de (mange) vigtige bøger til belysning af sagen. Eller læs blot dette interview med Oliver Stone i 2013:
"Were there any revelations that were so shocking that you left them out?
[Stone:] No. The most shocking part is in the film and very clearly outlined. It's the sequence of the shooting, the timing, the case the Zapruder film makes for our film, the wounds and the autopsy. It's all quite shocking when you think about it – think seriously about it. It doesn't make any sense the way they described it. That's the most shocking part of the case.
"Will the government ever release all of the assassination records?
[Stone:] That's a tough question. We don't even know how many there are. But we know from former Washington Post writer Jefferson Morley that, on October 25 in the Dallas Morning News, the CIA has acknowledged that, in a sworn affidavit, the agency retains 1,100 records related to the assassination that have never been made public. These files are not believed relevant to the death, but they concern the operation with six CIA employees involved in the JFK story who reported directly to James Angleton, the head of the CIA's counterintelligence staff, and Deputy Director Richard Helms, who attacked the film. These people were not investigated and they all hated Kennedy." http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/oliver-stone-looks-back-at-jfk-2...
Med den kvalitet 'venstreside' har højresiden i dag alt, alt for let spil. (Min kommentar på artiklens hjemmeside)
Ronny, du er vel godt klar over, at du selv (og alle andre), der accepterer den officielle version af 9/11 køber en 'konspirationsteori'? Det er så blot det dybt korrupte amerikanske establishment's version af en konspiration om Al Qaeda. Du tror altså på CIA, Cheney og Bush? - Jeg betragter CIA og folk som Cheney og Bush som de mindste troværdige mennesker i verden. Din tilgang synes ikke lige frem skarp.
Mht. falske flag og konspirationsteori generelt så ligger det i sagens natur, at man er nødt til at spekulere og undersøge ting, der er vanskelige at finde mange bekræftelser på - alene for at kunne sætte spørgsmålstegn ved de officielle versioner. Men at sætte generelt spørgsmålstegn ved selve ideen om 'konspirationsteorier' og 'falske flag' er uendeligt anti-intellektuelt og dybt konservativt.
Når det gælder om at implementere 'falske flag', så er CIA verdensmestre i 'falske flag' operationer. Hvor de siden anden verdenskrig konstant har støttet 'oppositioner' i alverdens lande og på den måde fået styrtet 'regimer', som ikke ville tjene USAs korporative interesser (der er en god del seriøs) litteratur omkring dette. Men den kender du vel, når du fører dig frem som velorienteret). Ja, CIA er et instrument for amerikanske korporative magtforhold. Det sagde Bernie Sanders allerede for fyrre år siden og han har stået ved det i den nærværende valgkamp. Og du trækker Cass Sunsteins bog frem som argument. Suk...
Jeg skal ikke bruge hele dagen på dette her. Så jeg vil nøjes med et par link nedenfor, jeg lige har googlet frem efter hukommelsen på et par minutter. Her først et link til min egen artikel om USAs korrupte politiske system, USAs korporative imperialisme og vores mediers propaganda for USAs krig i Syrien lige nu: http://www.kommunikationsforum.dk/artikler/USAs-politiske-system-er-korr...
Martin Luther Kings familie vandt i 1999 en retssag mod den amerikanske regering for en eller anden form for medvirken i MLK's drab: "Dr. Martin Luther King’s family and personal friend/attorney, William F. Pepper, won a civil trial that found US government agencies guilty of assassination/wrongful death. The 1999 trial, King Family versus Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, is the only trial ever conducted on the assassination of Dr. King. The King Center fully documents the case, with full trial transcript (to more fully explain the following summary of evidence, here is the best article I’ve found)."
Selvom Kings familie bad om, at medierne skulle sprede denne historie, så er det vist aldrig sket (fortæl mig endelig, hvis jeg tager fejl!): "Coretta Scott King: “We have done what we can to reveal the truth, and we now urge you as members of the media, and we call upon elected officials, and other persons of influence to do what they can to share the revelation of this case to the widest possible audience.” – King Family Press Conference, Dec. 9, 1999."
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/01/martin-luther-king-assassinated-u...
I 2013 fik en engelsk statsborger rettens ord for, at BBC havde lavet falske repræsentationer af 9/11. Her et citat fra artiklen:
"Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.
So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee."
https://www.sott.net/article/266268-UK-man-wins-court-case-against-BBC-f...
Læs om den canadiske filosof og fredsaktivist John McMurtry her https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McMurtry
Se denne video hvor han går kritisk til den officielle 9/11 konspirationsteori: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93qmlKH_d8c
Der er meget, der tyder på, at John F. Kennedy også blev myrdet af højtstående amerikanske folk - sammen med CIA og/eller FBI. Læs nogle af de (mange) vigtige bøger til belysning af sagen. Eller læs blot dette interview med Oliver Stone i 2013:
"Were there any revelations that were so shocking that you left them out?
[Stone:] No. The most shocking part is in the film and very clearly outlined. It's the sequence of the shooting, the timing, the case the Zapruder film makes for our film, the wounds and the autopsy. It's all quite shocking when you think about it – think seriously about it. It doesn't make any sense the way they described it. That's the most shocking part of the case.
"Will the government ever release all of the assassination records?
[Stone:] That's a tough question. We don't even know how many there are. But we know from former Washington Post writer Jefferson Morley that, on October 25 in the Dallas Morning News, the CIA has acknowledged that, in a sworn affidavit, the agency retains 1,100 records related to the assassination that have never been made public. These files are not believed relevant to the death, but they concern the operation with six CIA employees involved in the JFK story who reported directly to James Angleton, the head of the CIA's counterintelligence staff, and Deputy Director Richard Helms, who attacked the film. These people were not investigated and they all hated Kennedy." http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/oliver-stone-looks-back-at-jfk-2...