<br />
<b>Notice</b>:  Undefined offset: 8192 in <b>C:\xampp2\htdocs\drupal7\includes\common.inc</b> on line <b>553</b><br />
<br />
<b>Notice</b>:  Undefined offset: 8192 in <b>C:\xampp2\htdocs\drupal7\includes\common.inc</b> on line <b>560</b><br />
<br />
<b>Notice</b>:  Undefined property: stdClass::$theme in <b>C:\xampp2\htdocs\drupal7\includes\theme.inc</b> on line <b>45</b><br />
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://localhost/drupal7" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>venstresida.net - Gramsci and Lenin - Kommentarer</title>
 <link>http://localhost/drupal7/?q=node/4129</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Gramsci and Lenin&quot;</description>
 <language>no</language>
<item>
 <title>Gramsci and Lenin</title>
 <link>http://localhost/drupal7/?q=node/4129</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width=100 align=left hspace=10 src=&quot;https://thegramsciblog.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/gramsci_image_eugenio_hansen1.png&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;As I have briefly touched upon previously there has been some disagreement on the ideological relationship between Lenin and Gramsci. I believe this mainly has two reasons.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. For posterity the ideology of “Leninism” or rather “Marxism-Leninism” was established by Stalin after Lenin’s death. Lenin then became a vehicle to promote Stalins own ideas and to legitimize his power, often with great disregard to Lenin’s actual ideas (two obvious examples – Lenin’s disregard of statues and other forms of idealization of great men, and Lenin’s attempt to remove Stalin shortly before his death). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Posteritys ideas of Leninism therefore often had little connection to Lenin’s actual thought and the discrepancy with the ideas of Gramsci therefore became greater than they had to be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. The other reason is that the most influential part of Gramsci’s work – the prison notebooks – were written after Lenin’s death, and it is therefore impossible to know how Lenin – who always was a politician writing for the here and now – would have evaluated the situation at the time Gramsci was then writing. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gramsci himself, e.g. in Q7§16 about war of position and war of manouvre, believed that Lenin was moving toward the same ideas Gramsci was:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“It seems to me as Ilitch had understood the need of a change away from war of manouvre, which had led to victory in the east in 1917, towards a war of position, as the only possible war in the west.” (My translation).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gramsci therefore can be said to be a Schrödingers Leninist – both a Leninist and not a Leninist at the same time. Whether he is one is disclosed only when the definition of “Leninist” in question is revealed. He was a Leninist as far as he himself believed to be mainly in line with Lenin’s thoughts. He was however not a Leninist in the sense the term was used in the orthodox soviet sphere after Stalin’s seizure of power.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://localhost/drupal7/?q=node/4129#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://localhost/drupal7/?q=taxonomy/term/1">Politikk</category>
 <category domain="http://localhost/drupal7/?q=taxonomy/term/6">English</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 11:52:40 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ronny</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4129 at http://localhost/drupal7</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
